[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q; syslog.socket dependency

[Michael Chapman]

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> > Can you think of a better way of wording the documentation? 
> 
> It depends: Do you consider /dev/log to be a "syslog socket"?
> (I'm not running rsyslog there)

I'm not quite sure what you mean. If where you're going is "well 
*obviously* syslog.socket refers to /dev/log", then ... maybe that's true, 
but that ship has sailed. It simply doesn't, it means what it currently 
means: the socket by which journald sends messages to some other syslog 
daemon (if any).