[systemd-devel] issues with systemd-cryptsetup at .service after in 251-rc3

Dusty Mabe dusty at dustymabe.com
Tue May 24 00:53:30 UTC 2022



On 5/22/22 08:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 03:51:58PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Daan De Meyer wrote:
>>>> Am 19.05.22 um 05:32 schrieb Dusty Mabe:
>>>>> I'm requesting help to try to find a problematic commit between
>>>>> v251-rc2..v251-rc3.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have a test in Fedora CoreOS [1] that tests luks and this test
>>>>> started failing in our rawhide stream with the introduction of
>>>>> 251-rc3. Reverting back to 251-rc2 makes the failing test go away. I
>>>>> briefly looked at the commits from v251-rc2..v251-rc3 but nothing
>>>>> jumped out at me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any commits in there that we think might be risky or ones we should
>>>>> look at closer?
>>>>
>>>> Please bisect. It’s the most efficient way, and you can do it yourself,
>>>> especially as you have a test to reproduce the issue.
>>>>
>>>>> Here's the original bug [2] I opened against Fedora CoreOS:
>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/tree/testing-devel/tests/kola/root-reprovision/luks
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1200
>>
>> No idea. There were a few changes to udev and sd-device, and it's
>> possible that they caused some regression. But I don't see anything
>> obvious.
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87360713 has a
> scratch builds with one patch reverted.  Could you test if it fixes
> the issue?

Just tested a build of FCOS with that scratch build included. It passes our
tests now so it looks like it was that patch that was the problem.


Dusty


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list