[systemd-devel] systemd-network and loopback
Andrea Pappacoda
andrea at pappacoda.it
Sat Sep 10 14:42:54 UTC 2022
Il giorno ven 9 set 2022 alle 23:57:27 +03:00:00, Mantas Mikulėnas
<grawity at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> It's useful when you want the `lo` interface to have a custom
> [Address] or two.
>
> Routers often have an address assigned that's supposed to be
> independent from any "physical" interface – on Linux it could be
> assigned to a Type=dummy interface or to an empty bridge, but just as
> frequently it's assigned to `lo`. (It's even called a "loopback
> address".)
Hi Mantas, thanks for your reply! Yes, this seems to be the kind of
response I was looking for. So it indeed seems that in the vast
majority of desktop systems (and servers) it is safe to leave the lo
interface as unmanaged by systemd-network.
Thanks again for clearing this up for me :)
--
OpenPGP key: 66DE F152 8299 0C21 99EF A801 A8A1 28A8 AB1C EE49
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list