[systemd-devel] Correct way to read from journal after poll() returns
Etienne Cordonnier
ecordonnier at snap.com
Mon Oct 7 17:23:07 UTC 2024
Hello,
I am updating a system from systemd v250 to systemd v255. There is some
small utility on the system using sd_journal_add_match() to react on
coredumps being printed to the journal:
sd_journal_open(...);
poll_fd = sd_journal_get_fd(...);
sd_journal_seek_tail(...);
sd_journal_previous(...);
sd_journal_add_match(..., "MESSAGE_ID=fc2e22bc6ee647b6b90729ab34a250b1");
poll(poll_fd)
When poll returns, sd_journal_process() is called, followed by
sd_journal_next() in case sd_journal_process() does not return
SD_JOURNAL_NOP
This is very similar to
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/man/journal-iterate-poll.c ,
except that there is a call to sd_journal_add_match, and that
sd_journal_next is called after poll().
This used to work with systemd v250, however it does not work with v255
(sd_journal_next() always returns 0 which means "no new data"). I bisected
it, and the commit after which it stops working is
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/7a4ee861615101ddd2f95056cf30e69e41da86ce
What is the correct way to read the journal entry after poll() returns,
meaning a match as configured by sd_journal_add_match() was found?
Should sd_journal_get_data() be called directly instead of
sd_journal_next()?
I'd like to extend
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/man/journal-iterate-poll.c to
make the proper way to do this clearer, in case sd_journal_next() is not
the correct way.
Thanks,
Étienne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20241007/572fb9d8/attachment.htm>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list