[Bug 22031] New: Answering a call you've put on hold without taking it off hold is confusing.

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22031

           Summary: Answering a call you've put on hold without taking it
                    off hold is confusing.
           Product: Telepathy
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: low
         Component: telepathy-gabble
        AssignedTo: telepathy-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
        ReportedBy: will.thompson at collabora.co.uk


* Alice calls Bob; Bob's Gabble sends a <ringing/> notification.
* Bob puts the call on Hold; his Gabble sends a <hold/> notification.
* Bob answers the call; his Gabble sends <active/> which cancels the <hold/>.

So now Alice thinks she's off hold, but Bob still thinks the call's on hold.

I'm inclined to say that we don't want to support answering calls while they're
on hold (it's meaningless), and smcv thinks this makes sense. So maybe
AddMembers should fail with o.fd.T.StreamedMedia.OnHold or something.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.