[Bug 24699] don't abuse M_T_Action for nudges
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Mar 15 17:50:46 CET 2010
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24699
Jonny Lamb <jonny.lamb at collabora.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|should not advertise |don't abuse M_T_Action for
|Message_Type_Action unless |nudges
|able to deal with all |
|messages of that type |
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Lamb <jonny.lamb at collabora.co.uk> 2010-03-15 09:50:45 PST ---
We already do this:
method call sender=:1.48 -> dest=:1.28 serial=131
path=/org/freedesktop/Telepathy/Connection/butterfly/msn/jonny_40jonnylamb_2ecom/TextChannel1;
interface=org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Type.Text; member=GetMessageTypes
method return sender=:1.28 -> dest=:1.48 reply_serial=131
array [
uint32 0
]
16:42 < jonnylamb> smcv: I'm confused as to what you're actually asking
for in fd.o#24699 now.
16:42 < jonnylamb> smcv: You note in the Empathy bug that butterfly only
returns NORMAL in GetMessageTypes().
16:42 < jonnylamb> So surely "should not advertise Message_Type_Action
unless able to deal with all messages of that type" is
satisfied?
16:43 < smcv> jonnylamb: if that is the case then yes
16:44 < smcv> jonnylamb: I was wrong about the butterfly bug initially, I
thought butterfly advertised Normal and Action but Action
only worked for nudges
16:44 < jonnylamb> You're right about the second part -- if we're given
an action message type and it's a nudge then we send a
nudge over the wire, otherwise we, don't?
16:45 < smcv> (Normal, *) -> "*"
16:45 < istaz> jonnylamb: it was about the /nudge, we only return NORMAL
but empathy don't check that, and /nudge is only accepted
as ACTION_TYPE and don't accept if that's not /nudge
16:45 < jonnylamb> But seeing as we don't advertise ACTION, I think we
can do what the hell we want if someone gives us an
Action message. :-)
16:45 < smcv> (Action, "nudge") -> protocol nudge
16:45 < smcv> (Action, "dies") -> error
16:45 < smcv> jonnylamb: in principle you're right, although I still
think it's an abuse of Action messages
16:46 < smcv> and the Empathy bug isn't blocked by the butterfly bug as I
initially thought, but is still a rather annoying bug
16:46 < jonnylamb> I'm actually in favour of removing nudge support in
butterfly.
16:46 < smcv> s/in butterfly// :-)
16:46 < jonnylamb> Maybe we should hook it up so if a contact nudges you,
he or she is automatically blocked.
16:48 < jonnylamb> Anyway, I'm going to close that bug because it's not a
bug. If you want the bug to mean something else, say
now or forever hold your peace.
16:48 < smcv> indeed, nudging should either be ignored, or be a
Channel.Interface.Annoyance or something (which Empathy
would implement as the URGENT hint
16:48 < smcv> )
16:49 < smcv> jonnylamb: would you mind re-purposing it as "don't abuse
M_T_Action for nudges"? (if so you can drop the severity of
course)
16:49 < jonnylamb> ok
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the telepathy-bugs
mailing list