[Bug 26752] Setting a not supported presence state to a telepathy account does not deliver any failing feedback
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri May 7 15:44:06 CEST 2010
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26752
--- Comment #13 from Andre Moreira Magalhaes <andrunko at gmail.com> 2010-05-07 06:44:06 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Specification
> =============
>
> > + <p>This property indicates whether the account's
> > + <tp:member-ref>Connection</tp:member-ref> is changing presence</p>
>
> I preferred my version: "If true, a change to the presence of this account is
> in progress."
Done
> > +
> > + <tp:rationale>
> > + <p>Use cases:</p>
> > +
> > + <ul>
> > + <li>user has two applets (one in the desktop area and another
> > + one in the system tray area) showing the current presence.
> > + User tries to change the presence and ChangingPresence changes > to
> > + true. Now both applets start to blink. After the presence is set,
> > + ChangingPresence changes to false and both applets now show the
> > + <tp:member-ref>CurrentPresence</tp:member-ref>.</li>
> > + </ul>
> > + </tp:rationale>
>
> That's only one use case, so it doesn't really need to be in a list :-)
>
> I'd be inclined to move this to the end of the docstring so the whole
> description of how the property works comes first, and shorten it to something
> like:
> <tp:rationale>
> <p>This allows UIs to indicate that a presence change is in progress
> or has finished, even if the change was initiated by a different
> UI.</p>
>
> <p>For instance, Maemo 5 and Empathy indicate a presence change by
> having the presence indicator alternate between the RequestedPresence
> and the CurrentPresence; they should start blinking when
> ChangingPresence becomes true, and stop when it becomes false.</p>
> </tp:rationale>
Done
> > + <p>The AccountManager MUST set this property to true whenever a change
> > + in the account's <tp:member-ref>Connection</tp:member-ref> presence is
> > + requested. When the change is finished, either successfully or with an
> > + error, this property MUST be set to false.</p>
> > + </tp:docstring>
>
> I preferred my version, which makes it explicit how things should combine into
> AccountPropertyChanged signals:
>
> Whenever _RequestedPresence_ is set on an account that could
> go online, or whenever an account with a non-offline
> _RequestedPresence_ becomes able to go online (for instance
> because _Enabled_ or _Valid_ changes to True), ChangingPresence MUST
> change to True, and the two property changes MUST be emitted in the same
> _AccountPropertyChanged_ signal, before the Set method returns.
>
> When the account manager succeeds or fails in changing the presence,
> or the connection disconnects due to an error, ChangingPresence MUST
> change to False as part of the same _AccountPropertyChanged_ signal.
>
Done
> Mission Control
> ===============
>
> The MC branch looks good now, but please don't merge it just yet - I'd much
> rather do a spec release with this change included, get that into
> telepathy-glib, and get MC depending on that telepathy-glib.
Great, tnx
> telepathy-qt4
> =============
>
> > + * \fn void Account::isChangingPresence(bool value);
>
> I think you mean changingPresence(bool).
I Used isChangingPresence cause we use isSomething for other boolean accessors,
as in isValid/isEnabled/... but I can change it if you prefer.
> Other than that, it looks OK, conditional on updating telepathy-qt4 to a spec
> release that includes this property.
Yep, tp-qt4 will only include this when we update the spec, it's just that I
already implemented it so I could test it easily.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the telepathy-bugs
mailing list