[Bug 24909] Anonymity API (e.g. suppressing caller-ID)

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24909

--- Comment #32 from Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> 2010-05-10 02:46:27 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> OTOH, if we're willing to squint just a little bit, we can still only use
> flags, so we don't need to have multiple properties as well. The squint here is
> to ignore the fact that the two flags (of the three currently proposed) are not
> independent - and clarify what happens if the client or cm set both (my opinion
> is, the anonymising one wins, since we want to err on the side of privacy).

Prior art exists for these pseudo-flags: Message_Part_Support_Flags are not
independent either, but were implemented as flags so we can have "genuine
flags" later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.