[Bug 28866] Allow channel requesters to associate metadata with requests for the benefit of other clients

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28866

Guillaume Desmottes <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|                            |r+

--- Comment #23 from Guillaume Desmottes <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> 2010-11-17 07:11:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> One point of disagreement with wjt in Comment #17: I added an a{sv} for
> Connection properties too, on the basis that connection-observing will require
> some sort of "immutable" properties dict. If we never use it, so be it.

Fair enough. I think path + properties is a nice patent when announcing
objects.

> Do we also want an a{sv} for future expansion? Answers on a postcard. 

I can't think of anything that wouldn't work using Hints. Oth, the whole point
of future expansion is to be future proof for cases we didn't think about. :)
But I still think we shouldn't need it.

> If we do,
> we could drop the hypothetical connection properties on the basis that they can
> go in there when needed.

I wouldn't do that, as said explicit path + props are cool.


branch++

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.