[Bug 59024] Think about a more introspectable way of doing mixins
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Jan 8 13:30:41 CET 2013
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59024
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Claessens <xclaesse at gmail.com> ---
Extra potential g-i problems:
6) tp_foo_mixin_init_dbus_properties(GObjectClass*): is it possible to call in
class_init in binding languages? what are the alternatives?
7) tp_foo_mixin_iface_init(): Can we give functions to implement the dbus
ifaces in a subclasses not in C?
8) tp_foo_mixin_do_something(): Will g-i understand that this is a function on
TpBaseConnection object? Will I be able to do base_connection.do_something()?
Maybe crazy, but I'm wondering if we should make those mixins really part of
TpBaseConnection, but optionally initialized. how it would looks like:
TpBaseConnectionPrivate{TpFooMixinPrivate *foo_mixin; ...}
TpBaseConnection::finalize{_tp_foo_mixin_free (self->priv->foo_mixin); ...}
tp_base_connection_init_foo(TpBaseConnection *self){self->priv->foo_mixin =
_tp_foo_mixin_new();}
tp_base_connection_foo_changed(TpBaseConnection *self)
{g_return_val_if_fail(self->priv->foo_mixin != NULL); ...}
But still that won't fix 6) and 7).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the telepathy-bugs
mailing list