[Bug 16891] Telepathy should support OTR encryption

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16891

--- Comment #44 from Giulio <bugzi at opentrashbox.org> ---
After all that NSA, PRISM, etc, scandal, I don't want to imagine the silly face
Telepathy's developers who stated so arrogantly that security wasn't very
important must have every morning. They thought that critic users who were
demanding security were little less than intellectually retarded people, who
couldn't distinguish what is really important, whereas they, the developers, in
"Their infinite wisdom", had the Truth, knowing what was prioritary, not us,
stupid users who can't even code.
After all these of costant slapping in their faces from the news, the papers,
the public; in short: the reality, one would think they must have become a
little humbler (Christ, they even rejected to work on encryption despite people
was ready to collect money pay them to do it!), but it seems that things
haven't evolved too much, right? (KDE's Telepathy implementation has even been
removed from Prism Break website because its [lack of] security is just
unacceptable: https://github.com/nylira/prism-break/issues/939 )

Well, we, the critic users, aren't developers in this project, or at all. We
can't tell them to do what we think is prioritary when the other 90% of users
think is not (y'all know: a trillion flies can't be wrong. Let's eat sh*t), nor
can we write an encryption plugin, so I think all critic users should stop
trying to make TP devs reason, it's a lost cause.
I suspect that Collabora, the company after Telepathy, might have been
intentionally delaying as much as possible the "securization" of Telepathy. We
known now that the obscure hand of the NSA has been involved in the development
of cryptography standards and even in TOR. As an iceberg's peak, surely we
don't even imagine the 90% unter the water. Suspiction is not knowledge, of
course, but all that immovable interest in not writting a damn plugin for OTR o
implementing any other secure encryption method year after year, even when
people was ready to pay... Well, it just smells rather fishy.


So, dear folks who do know that fascistoid governments and companies arent
interested in "bad guys" only but want to have controlled all of their people
"just in case", simply use Pidgin; it's ugly as a witch, yes, but it works; or
if you want to polute your system with Java, you have Jisti, which is more
feature rich, but I don't think all this discussion, all this bitching and all
that "We are the devs, if you wan't something do it yourself!" has any sense,
and even less if there are interests who don't want our conversations to be
private.



Cheers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.