[Bug 97630] export macros for tp-qt-service are wrong / should tp-qt-service be separate?

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97630

--- Comment #2 from George Kiagiadakis <gkiagia at tolabaki.gr> ---
Hmm, splitting the service library would help with the API/ABI management, but
I personally think it's a bad idea because of testing, as you say. I would
personally like it if we gradually remove the tp-glib parts from our unit tests
and replace them with equivalent tp-qt code. The only reason that we have the
tp-glib dependency is because we need the service-side bindings there.

I am fine with keeping the situation as it is now until the API of the
service-side bindings is considered stable. Afterwards, we can merge it into
the main library. I mainly filed the bug report as a reminder.

Regarding the other stuff in tp-qt, there was once an idea (which still sounds
tempting today) to move the generated stuff of tp-glib and tp-qt both into the
tp-spec repository. This would avoid copying the spec into the tp-glib and
tp-qt repositories and would also remove all the build cruft that we now have
around.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.