[Telepathy-commits] [telepathy-spec/master] ChannelDispatchOperation: improve wording of HandleWith and Claim
Simon McVittie
simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk
Fri Sep 26 08:21:22 PDT 2008
---
spec/Channel_Dispatch_Operation.xml | 12 +++++++-----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/spec/Channel_Dispatch_Operation.xml b/spec/Channel_Dispatch_Operation.xml
index 2cbcfea..51321c0 100644
--- a/spec/Channel_Dispatch_Operation.xml
+++ b/spec/Channel_Dispatch_Operation.xml
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@
completed and the object has already gone. If this occurs, it
indicates that another approver has asked for the bundle to be
handled by a particular handler. The approver MUST NOT attempt
- to handle the channels itself in this case.</p>
+ to interact with the channels further in this case, unless it is
+ separately invoked as the handler.</p>
<p>Approvers which are also channel handlers SHOULD use Claim instead
of HandleWith to request that they can handle a channel bundle
@@ -136,9 +137,9 @@
<method name="Claim">
<tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Called by an approver to claim a channel bundle for handling
- internally. The process calling this method becomes the handler for
- the channel, but <em>does not</em> have the HandleChannels method
- called on it.</p>
+ internally. If this method is called successfully, the process
+ calling this method becomes the handler for the channel, but
+ <em>does not</em> have the HandleChannels method called on it.</p>
<!-- FIXME: tp:dbus-ref -->
<p>Clients that call Claim on a channel and do not immediately
@@ -165,7 +166,8 @@
<p>This method may fail because the dispatch operation has already
been completed. Again, see HandleWith for more details. The approver
- MUST NOT attempt to close the channels itself in this case.</p>
+ MUST NOT attempt to interact with the channels further in this
+ case.</p>
<p>(FIXME: list some possible errors)</p>
--
1.5.6.5
More information about the Telepathy-commits
mailing list