[Telepathy] [Bug 19613] ContactInfo: terminology inconsistent with RFC2426, and no room for expansion
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Jan 16 09:31:26 PST 2009
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19613
Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL|http://http://git.collabora.|http://git.collabora.co.uk/?
|co.uk/?p=user/smcv/telepathy|p=user/smcv/telepathy-spec-
|-spec- |smcv.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/h
|smcv.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/h|eads/contactinfo
|eads/contactinfo |
Keywords| |patch
--- Comment #1 from Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> 2009-01-16 09:31:26 PST ---
Oops, didn't mean to submit that yet. What I meant to say was:
In the current ContactInfo draft, vCard fields' type parameters are referred to
as "flags". The RFC calls them type parameters, and we should call them that,
to avoid confusion with our <tp:flags> (bitfield) structures.
Also, Mandatory is a boolean when it could usefully be a uint containing a
bitfield of flags, with one flag (Parameters_Mandatory) currently defined.
My contactinfo branch documents this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Telepathy
mailing list