[Telepathy] Bugs from Ubuntu
guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk
Wed Feb 9 00:03:49 PST 2011
Le mardi 08 février 2011 à 14:10 -0500, Brian Curtis a écrit :
> Hi empathy/telepathy devs/contributors,
> I have a simple question, but I hope I can gather some useful
> information from your viewpoint (upstream) in order to better our
> (Ubuntu) quality of bug reports.
First let me thank you for the work you're doing to forward bugs to us.
Ubuntu is by far the distribution from which I receive the most bugs;
that's really really useful to me to known about regressions and nasty
> The question: What can we do to better our bug reports?
The current situation is not too bad, but there is certainly room for
- Picking the right component. I receive a lot of Empathy bugs which are
actually connection manager bugs (tp-butterfly or tp-haze most of the
time). Suchs bugs should be reported directly to bugs.freedesktop.org
and not on the GNOME's bugzilla. I understand that the Empathy/Telepathy
architecture is a bit complex and it's not always easy to know the
component being faulty for a bug, but in general if the answer to "Do
you observe this issue with other protocols?" is no, there is good
chances that's a Telepathy bug rather than an Empathy one.
- Crashers without stack trace. I doesn't happen that much tbh, but a
good trace when reporting a crasher is a must have to us. Thanks to
launchpad's awesome retracing service, I can generally find a trace in a
comment on the LP bug but having it pasted in the first post would be
- No logs. For a lot of bugs, logs are needed to help us understanding
the issue. Logs can easily be gathered from the Help -> Debug menu in
Empathy, always having them attached when a bug is forwarded would save
us a lot of time.
I started writing an apport hook to automatically gather logs when
reporting an Empathy bug . It has been discussed at the UDS in
"Brussels" to integrate it at some point, but according to the blueprint
it seems to have been delayed again.
More information about the telepathy