[Telepathy] future of Telepathy?
nik at naturalnet.de
Mon Apr 25 13:41:20 UTC 2016
> With my GNOME hat on, we are not spending much effort on our instant
> messaging features. For a free software desktop, XMPP was by far the
> most useful and mature part of Telepathy. Google, Facebook and
> Microsoft has either moved away from XMPP or deprecated it, while
> Telegram and Whatsapp use something different.
WhatsApp uses XMPP. It is slightly modified to force people to use the
official client, but it is XMPP.
> None of the XMPP-based free VoIP options ever worked reliably. They
> were spotty at best.
That was years ago. Look at Jitsi, the Jitsi video bridge and Jitsi Meet.
The main issue with XMPP-based VoIP is client implementations. XMPP-VoIP never
worked reliably in Telepathy because Telepathy's implementation of XMPP-VoIP
I don't mean to be rude, and I think the Telepathy developers sure do a good
job, but please do not blame it on XMPP itself.
> Given how hard it is to support any of the popular instant messaging
> networks, a free software IM stack looks increasingly pointless. Maybe
> someone will come up with a mature Telegram implementation ...
Given the above, please all stop whining and start get Telepathy back on
track, thus bringing XMPP forward by providing another well-working client,
instead of bringing support for proprietary protocols forward!
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296
Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918
Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor
LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 888 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the telepathy