[Uim] Proposal for SigScheme

[Kazuki Ohta]

Thank you for your reply.

> > This proposal relates to SRFI. I'm now considering
> > about whether SigScheme implement it. I think
> > SigScheme's core should be small. So, I plan to
> > implement SRFI's procedures in Scheme code as much as I
> > can.
> >
> > How do you think about this?
>
> Sometimes Scheme code consumes much more memory than C,
> so that depends on the situation.
>
> In addition, development cost is also important. If
> writing in Scheme is considerably easy, Scheme code sould
> be used. Rewriting with C later is always possible.
Now I decided to write SRFI-1 list procedure library in C for
considering memory consumption, you pointed out, and good
C interface.

Development cost is not the problem (Maybe 1 or 2 days are
needed for getting things done). But this feature should be
configurable, because I intend SigScheme is not only for uim.
It aims to be embedded in various programs:-)

regards.

-------------------------------------------------
Kazuki Ohta : mover at hct.zaq.ne.jp
-------------------------------------------------