[Uim] Questions on coding for uim

Park Jae-hyeon jhpark at kias.re.kr
Sat Jun 25 03:58:23 EEST 2005


Hello, Kazuki,

Thank you for the explanation.  Maybe my worry was too early.  :)

Regards,

Jae-hyeon

Kazuki Ohta <mover at hct.zaq.ne.jp> writes:

> So, if we use the R5RS compatible scheme interpreter, we'll need to
> implement sanity check for '() in context-update-preedit. passing #f to
> contex-update-preedit is semantically wrong, I think.



More information about the uim mailing list