<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - drawing performance worse than X" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763350#c22">Comment # 22</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - drawing performance worse than X" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763350">bug 763350</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=christian%40hergert.me" title="Christian Hergert <christian@hergert.me>"> Christian Hergert</a> <pre>(In reply to Matthias Clasen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=763350#c21">comment #21</a>) > Jonas points out this code as an example for use of a large pool in wayland > clients: > > <a href="https://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/clients/window.c#n1077">https://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/tree/clients/window.c#n1077</a> While this seems like a good idea long term, I don't think it is in the way of us getting better draw performance with the 1:1 mapping. My crappy hack did a 48mb map and rotated through the items and it had very little effect. Although, once the frame clock stuff is more inline with weston, maybe it will be a bit more obvious that is needed too?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>