<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - gtk_window_move() unreliable in Wayland?" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757558#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - gtk_window_move() unreliable in Wayland?" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757558">bug 757558</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=ofourdan%40redhat.com" title="Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>"> Olivier Fourdan</a> <pre>(In reply to Milan Crha from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=757558#c20">comment #20</a>) > I'd be happy to, but as long as a runtime warning is printed it cannot be > considered fixed. Either the code is still wrong or the runtime warning is > wrong. But aren't these two different things? <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=757558#c0">Comment #0</a> was about the popup being misplaced on Wayland, which is fixed with gtk+ 3.20 and does not require a grab anymore (just a parent window for the popup, as shown in <a href="attachment.cgi?id=327242" name="attach_327242" title="Rworked reproducer as per comment 18">attachment 327242</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=327242&action=edit" title="Rworked reproducer as per comment 18">[details]</a> whci works with both X11 and Wayland backend).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>