<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Clipboard (copy-and-paste) Wayland→Wayland or Wayland→X11 from closed applications is broken" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759626#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Clipboard (copy-and-paste) Wayland→Wayland or Wayland→X11 from closed applications is broken" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759626">bug 759626</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=mcatanzaro%40gnome.org" title="Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@gnome.org>"> Michael Catanzaro</a> <pre>(In reply to Jonas Ådahl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=759626#c3">comment #3</a>) > Why would there be a need for a new request? Is it for making the client > control what selections would be more "persistent" than others or something? > Otherwise, it should work already, the way same clipboard.c in weston works. Oooh, didn't know about this. Yeah, it's clearly not necessary if we store selection data automatically... my mind jumped to it because it's required in ICCM. So we can avoid this complexity. The original purpose of the separate store request was to avoid unnecessary clipboard IPC overhead, but it's surely not relevant in 2016.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>