<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Wayland lacks cross-process synchronisation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97353#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Wayland lacks cross-process synchronisation" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97353">bug 97353</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:tomek.bury@gmail.com" title="Tomek Bury <tomek.bury@gmail.com>"> Tomek Bury</a> <pre>I meant Sailfish OS compositor and Jolla (ex. Nokia) - they did have this problem. Sorry for the confusion. Now, bear in mind that the "implicit fencing" requirement is an implicit requirement itself. It's never spelled out amongst Wayland requirements AFAIK. EGL/GLES2, shared buffers and a couple of extensions are mentioned but implicit sync is not. Please point me to this requirement if it's written somewhere. If it's not, then perhaps this should be a bug report. As for building implicit sync into driver - it's rather expensive, risky and utterly pointless to significantly change the architecture and rewrite core parts of a working driver just to have implicit cross-process synchronisation on every platform when Wayland is the only platform that assumes it. Android requires EXPLICIT sync and that's a completely different beast.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>