<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Port backend to use xdg-shell unstable v6"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769937#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Port backend to use xdg-shell unstable v6"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769937">bug 769937</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=jadahl%40gmail.com" title="Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jonas Ådahl</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Matthias Clasen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=769937#c11">comment #11</a>)
<span class="quote">> Review of <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=333360&action=diff" name="attach_333360" title="wayland: Remove gdk_wayland_display_get_xdg_shell()">attachment 333360</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=333360&action=edit" title="wayland: Remove gdk_wayland_display_get_xdg_shell()">[details]</a></span> <a href='review?bug=769937&attachment=333360'>[review]</a> [review]:
>
> I don't think we want to remove a symbol that has been around since 3.8. Can
> we just document it as 'unstable, don't use' ?</span >
That'd mean defining struct xdg_surface ourself and always return NULL. Is that
good enough?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>