<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=mclasen%40redhat.com" title="Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Matthias Clasen</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Port backend to use xdg-shell unstable v6"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769937">bug 769937</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>mclasen@redhat.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Port backend to use xdg-shell unstable v6"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769937#c22">Comment # 22</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Port backend to use xdg-shell unstable v6"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769937">bug 769937</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=mclasen%40redhat.com" title="Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Matthias Clasen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jonas Ådahl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=769937#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Matthias Clasen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=769937#c11">comment #11</a>)
> > Review of <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=333360&action=diff" name="attach_333360" title="wayland: Remove gdk_wayland_display_get_xdg_shell()">attachment 333360</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=333360&action=edit" title="wayland: Remove gdk_wayland_display_get_xdg_shell()">[details]</a></span> <a href='review?bug=769937&attachment=333360'>[review]</a> [review] [review]:
> >
> > I don't think we want to remove a symbol that has been around since 3.8. Can
> > we just document it as 'unstable, don't use' ?
>
> That'd mean defining struct xdg_surface ourself and always return NULL. Is
> that good enough?</span >
Hmm, I don't think thats really useful. The function previously was never
returning NULL, so callers will not handle that. Anyway, debians codesearch
finds no callers, so we can probably get away with dropping this, after all.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>