<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - calculator is cropped when "maximized" (on wayland)" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771413#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - calculator is cropped when "maximized" (on wayland)" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771413">bug 771413</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=kparal%40redhat.com" title="Kamil Páral <kparal@redhat.com>"> Kamil Páral</a> <pre>(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=771413#c3">comment #3</a>) > It's merely a note in the bugzilla that this particular issue is already > fixed upstream. > > koji is Fedora, not sure it makes sense to link an upstream bug to > downstream processes. Well what I wanted to say is that I can test it if there are Fedora builds available already (testing a fix should be relevant even to an upstream project:)). In the end, we all use some distribution. If this doesn't require further testing, no problem. > Yes, but actually it's a dupe... Both bugs for gtk+ and mutter are closed > now, doesn't make sense to keep a dupe opened just because Fedora, does it? No. If it was an important bug, I would open a downstream bug to track it until it is fixed in Fedora.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>