<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - GtkSourceView completion popup window not shown, no grabbed seat found"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771694#c26">Comment # 26</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - GtkSourceView completion popup window not shown, no grabbed seat found"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771694">bug 771694</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=carlosg%40gnome.org" title="Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>"> <span class="fn">Carlos Garnacho</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jonas Ådahl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=771694#c24">comment #24</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Olivier Fourdan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=771694#c23">comment #23</a>)
> > So, IMHO, we should clone this bug for mutter and continue from there.
>
> This makes sense yes. Thinking of it, the keyboard focus semantics for
> non-grabbing zxdg_shell_v6 popups is pretty undefined. Same applies for
> subsurfaces, but in practice, subsurface never receive keyboard focus, so it
> might make sense to do the same for non-grabbing popups.</span >
FWIW I agree with this. It makes sense to preserve the non-grabbing behavior
across all capabilities, taking keyboard focus into it sounds like a partial
grab of sorts.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>