<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Allow resting the thumb on the touchpad while performing multi-finger gestures" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98800#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Allow resting the thumb on the touchpad while performing multi-finger gestures" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98800">bug 98800</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:pointedstick@zoho.com" title="Nate Graham <pointedstick@zoho.com>"> Nate Graham</a> <pre>OK, fair enough. I can see how even with RMI4 support, this could get really confusing with like three and four finger gestures. But how about just two-finger scrolling? That should be a really easy use case to detect: - Two fingers roughly next to each other are both going in the same direction which is only a maximum of a few degrees off from up-and-down or left-or-right - A third usually larger finger is more or less staying in one place, especially if that place is either on the bottom of the trackpad or any other location below and to the left or below and to the right of the moving fingers Could we re-purpose this bug to be about ignoring the thumb just for two-finger scrolling? That's the use case that makes sense, and I agree with you about the other gestures. Also, about Bugzilla etiquette: if someone else (e.g. you) moves a bug to a RESOLVED state and I think it deserves more attention or should be re-purposed, is it appropriate for me to move a bug back to UNRESOLVED, or would that be considered rude and instead I should try to convince the person who originally moved it to move it back?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>