<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Elantech touchpad with libinput has wrong number of buttons" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99200#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Elantech touchpad with libinput has wrong number of buttons" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99200">bug 99200</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:lukebenes@hotmail.com" title="Luke <lukebenes@hotmail.com>"> Luke</a> <pre>> the physical hardware has a single left button, the rest is software > emulated. I have no doubt that from the libinput's perspective there is no difference between my trackpad and a MacBook pro trackpad. But from the user’s perspective they couldn’t be more different. My trackpad is shifted to the left, meaning as the right hand comes down, and thumb is directly in the center of the pad. There is a visual indicator of 2 buttons, and there is no bump for tactical feedback, and it’s a smaller pad that the MacBook. I took the effort to file a bug report, because there’s a real usability issue here. If libinput developers insist on defaults that make sense to them rather than the actual users of the hardware, the end result will be that people will hate distros that use libinput. Distro like Fedora that use It will feel buggy, while others like Ubuntu that use synaptics will feel right.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>