<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176">bug 777176</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=jadahl%40gmail.com" title="Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>"> Jonas Ådahl</a> <pre>Review of <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343383&action=diff" name="attach_343383" title="[PATCH] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">attachment 343383</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343383&action=edit" title="[PATCH] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">[details]</a> <a href='review?bug=777176&attachment=343383'>[review]</a>: Wouldn't this mean we offset the popup by 1 pixel in this case? I.e. if GTK+ wants to position something against 0x0+50+50, we'd now position it at (51,51) if the default move-to-rect rules apply. The problem though is that I can't think of a valid rule that positions the menu against a point|line, as the min size of the anchor rect is as mentioned 1. So, this particular error condition might be a mistake, and should rather be if its negative size instead, allowing empty anchor rects.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>