<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176">bug 777176</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=ofourdan%40redhat.com" title="Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>"> Olivier Fourdan</a> <pre>Yes, as you say, xdg-shell v6 positionner definition makes it clear that the rectangle should not be 0: <a href="https://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/tree/unstable/xdg-shell/xdg-shell-unstable-v6.xml#n115">https://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/tree/unstable/xdg-shell/xdg-shell-unstable-v6.xml#n115</a> For an xdg_positioner object to be considered complete, it must have a non-zero size set by set_size, and a non-zero anchor rectangle set by set_anchor_rect. Passing an incomplete xdg_positioner object when positioning a surface raises an error. So the same error occurs with weston as well. There is a possibility that we can do, though, if the given size is zero, we use 1 as with <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343383&action=diff" name="attach_343383" title="[PATCH] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">attachment 343383</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343383&action=edit" title="[PATCH] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">[details]</a> <a href='review?bug=777176&attachment=343383'>[review]</a> but then compensate by moving the position by 1 pixel in the opposite direction. Definitely a hack, but that would give the expected result without breaking the existing rules.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>