<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [wayland] gedit killed by protocol error "Invalid anchor rectangle size"" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777176">bug 777176</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=ofourdan%40redhat.com" title="Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>"> Olivier Fourdan</a> <pre>(In reply to Jonas Ådahl from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=777176#c6">comment #6</a>) > The problem with that is that it'd be offset by 2 pixels if it flipped. Then > again, if this is supposed to open at the "|" cursor (maybe it should still > be a non-empty anchor that it should flip around, i.e. the width of the "|" > cursor thing. The flip case is not so obvious to spot to be honest, and much less likely to occur (this is a problem that occurs only when the pango layout is empty, which is not so common, and when the menu needs flipping, which is even less common). I reckon that <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343414&action=diff" name="attach_343414" title="[PATCH v2] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">attachment 343414</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=343414&action=edit" title="[PATCH v2] wayland: avoid 0 width/height anchor rectangle">[details]</a> <a href='review?bug=777176&attachment=343414'>[review]</a> is better for the most general, common case. And tbh, I can't spot a wrong offset even when flipped using the zoom :)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>