<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Tap timeout seems too low"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99447#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Tap timeout seems too low"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99447">bug 99447</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:grawity@gmail.com" title="Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Mantas Mikulėnas</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=129222" name="attach_129222" title="elantech tapspeed plot [MM]">attachment 129222</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=129222&action=edit" title="elantech tapspeed plot [MM]">[details]</a></span>
elantech tapspeed plot [MM]
(In reply to Peter Hutterer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99447#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Mantas Mikulėnas from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99447#c12">comment #12</a>)
> > Ran this on both of my laptops, not entirely sure how to interpret it but on
> > the synaptics laptop it seems to match the awk results: everything seems to
> > be concentrated around 73/83/94/104/115 ms.
>
> the points are the tap times grouped by ms, so in your case you have e.g. 9
> taps counted at (what I think is) 60ms. the vert lines are the mean, 50
> percentile, 90 and 95 percentile. So 90% of your taps come in at 104ms which
> is above the current limit of 100ms. That would mean that you have a bit
> over 10% detection failure.</span >
Right, and this might be caused by hardware (similar to that other bug report
by an XPS user) – for comparison, on my other laptop (with an old Elantech
touchpad) the 95% line is around ~70ms and everything is much more evenly
spread out.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>