<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Somehow conditionalize hysteresis (hardware black/whitelist, device property introspection, user-exposed setting, etc)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98839#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Somehow conditionalize hysteresis (hardware black/whitelist, device property introspection, user-exposed setting, etc)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98839">bug 98839</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:peter.hutterer@who-t.net" title="Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>"> Peter Hutterer</a> <pre>sorry, only just starting to catch up with bug mail again. the archlinux post suggests that for some users removing the hysteresis makes it worse again. As said above in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98839#c12">comment #12</a>, we may need a toggle for that, but rather than a config option for all users to set, I'd rather have a 'precise' vs 'lenient' choice (or whatever it'll be called). This would allow us to set other bits as well depending on the choice. Not 100% sure on all this yet though, mostly because there are so many complaints about touchpad acceleration open that I'm wondering whether this one here will go away once we fix most of those. but the main thing: here I can get pixel-granularity movement by rolling my finger (or moving it). The hysteresis applies only for the first **0.5mm** of movement, though it applies to the axes separately. So I'd really really like to see a proper analysis by someone who experiences the problem instead of just "let's disable it", because that's just papering over the issue.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>