<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Restoring maximized window state in Wayland results in tiny window"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783901#c21">Comment # 21</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Restoring maximized window state in Wayland results in tiny window"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783901">bug 783901</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=jadahl%40gmail.com" title="Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jonas Ådahl</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Olivier Fourdan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=783901#c20">comment #20</a>)
<span class="quote">> FWIW it still looks like a hack, doesn't seem right... But it improves
> things.</span >
Yet another reason for (in the future) reworking window state tracking more
thoroughly.
Anyhow, I think this is reasonable as solution for now, but I wonder if we
can't deal with the placement on unmaximize, by knowing that we don't have a
saved rect to restore to, instead of coming up with one now. I mean, things
might have changed while the window was maximized, and it makes more sense to
calculate a "good" position close to when its to be positioned, not when it was
initially maximized.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>