<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Detect pressure offset on proximity out as well"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103086#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Detect pressure offset on proximity out as well"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103086">bug 103086</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jehan@zemarmot.net" title="Jehan <jehan@zemarmot.net>"> <span class="fn">Jehan</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Peter Hutterer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103086#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> It happens most frequently with worn-out tools but that doesn't rule out
> that it can happen with new pens. The pressure offset in your pen is really
> small and the pressure drops 837, 714, 352, and then hovers below 10.
>
> This is in the kernel data though, I'm suprised X behaves differently -
> unless you're using the wacom driver. CC-ing Jason - do we have something
> there that takes this offset into account?</span >
I'm using whatever comes by default in Fedora 27 when setting GNOME on X.
In any case that works well in X, no similar problem related to pen pressure.
Tested and approved (and hopefully it'll stay that way!).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>