<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Detect pressure offset on proximity out as well"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103086#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Detect pressure offset on proximity out as well"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103086">bug 103086</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:killertofu@gmail.com" title="Jason Gerecke <killertofu@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jason Gerecke</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Peter Hutterer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103086#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> It happens most frequently with worn-out tools but that doesn't rule out
> that it can happen with new pens. The pressure offset in your pen is really
> small and the pressure drops 837, 714, 352, and then hovers below 10.
>
> This is in the kernel data though, I'm suprised X behaves differently -
> unless you're using the wacom driver. CC-ing Jason - do we have something
> there that takes this offset into account?</span >
I ran into an issue like this with one of our new "Pro Pen 3D" pens: I'd
occasionally get non-zero pressure values out of the tablet when hovering. This
caused some confusion when looking through the evemu-record logs, but didn't
seem to impact X.
The xf86-input-wacom driver has a click pressure threshold that defaults to
1.32%* of full-scale pressure. The values in the attached log fall under this
threshold, which is likely why there's no observed issue in X.
* 27/2047 for the pedantic</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>