<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Allow another local user to run programs on a WAYLAND_DISPLAY" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84817#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Allow another local user to run programs on a WAYLAND_DISPLAY" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84817">bug 84817</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:t4155553@mvrht.net" title="Paranoik <t4155553@mvrht.net>"> Paranoik</a> <pre>(In reply to Daniel Stone from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=84817#c13">comment #13</a>) > All these things are true of Wayland, and have been since day one. > ... > if you want the socket > to be more widely accessible, then you can make it more widely accessible. > It's not difficult. So let it be accessible to everyone by default. What this bug and all that sudo arguing are about? If wayland is secure then why the socket is closed and why wayland developers are against sudo'ed programs?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>