<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Lenovo Yoga 11S touchpad is jittery"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105108#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Lenovo Yoga 11S touchpad is jittery"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105108">bug 105108</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel.van.vugt@canonical.com" title="Daniel van Vugt <daniel.van.vugt@canonical.com>"> <span class="fn">Daniel van Vugt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Confirmed on two machines (Yoga 11S and X1 Carbon gen 5) that using fuzz is a
better idea than resolution/2. Just still not as good as completely disabling
hysteresis (the cursor still visibly moves in squares, just smaller squares
now).
Caveats:
1. That patch mentions this bug when it shouldn't. It's not a fix for this
bug.
2. That patch assumes fuzz==0 means unknown fuzz. But I suspect for some
devices, fuzz=0 is the correct fuzz to use (equivalent to never enabling
hysteresis at all). I can't find documentation confirming this theory though.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>