<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - wayland: fix fontconfig monitoring" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786693#c13">Comment # 13</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - wayland: fix fontconfig monitoring" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786693">bug 786693</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=tchaik%40gmx.com" title="Martin Blanchard <tchaik@gmx.com>"> Martin Blanchard</a> <pre>(In reply to Bastien Nocera from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=786693#c11">comment #11</a>) > (In reply to Martin Blanchard from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=786693#c9">comment #9</a>) > > (In reply to Bastien Nocera from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=786693#c8">comment #8</a>) > > > It also looks easy enough to extend and add support for the 2 other > > > GtkSettings if you're interested. > > > > Hummm, isn't 'gtk-enable-animations' already implemented as a gsetting? > > Yes, incorrectly so in the Wayland backend. In the X11 backend, animations > are force-disabled if the GSettings is false, then controlled by > gnome-settings-daemon, which will disable them if a software renderer is > used, or an external VNC client is connected. That makes sense. Shouldn't that be handled in a separate bug though?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>