<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [gnome-terminal] Very poor scrolling performance on wayland with high DPI"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778926#c25">Comment # 25</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [gnome-terminal] Very poor scrolling performance on wayland with high DPI"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778926">bug 778926</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=kubrick%40fgv6.net" title="François Guerraz <kubrick@fgv6.net>"> <span class="fn">François Guerraz</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Now that 3.28 is out, I've looked into it properly again, that is monitoring
not only the CPU usage but also the cpu frequency and power usage.
On my system (Skylake, HiDPI screen, Gnome 3.28), on battery, running
$ while true; do sleep 0.1; echo 1; done
On X, average cpu frequency is about 550MHz, terminal + X + gnome-shell cpu
usage combined is 25%, average power usage is 7.49W
On Wayland , average cpu frequency is about 650MHz, terminal + gnome-shell cpu
usage combined is 50%, average power usage is 10.17W
So we still have a measurably huge regression in cpu & power usage.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>