Graphics memory management in ARM/Embedded Linux
tomcooksey at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 03:11:12 PDT 2011
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/4/20 Tom Cooksey <tomcooksey at gmail.com>:
> > So while I agree re-inventing something just for the sake of it is bad,
> > that's not what's happening.
> > In fact, I think there's a good chance TTM will
> > be ripped out, stuck into its own driver (with its own device node
> > and extended to meet everyone's requirements.
> I'm having a hard time understanding how these two seemingly
> contradictory sentences fit one after another. Are you saying that
> this new project will be modifying TTM and sticking it in its own
> driver with its own device node?
If this is something you're interested in, why not pop onto the mailing list
and join the discussion? Take a look at the patches being proposed and give
feedback. It sounds like you have understanding of TTM which people in that
community might not have. Go help them out.
Also, I've briefly described my thoughts of what they could do, but you're
getting 3rd-hand information from someone who's no idea how TTM or even GEM
works and has no idea what the community's goals are. I'm probably wrong
(very likely in fact), go find out for yourself! :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wayland-devel