Finishing the network protocol

[Enrico Weigelt]

* Kristian Høgsberg <krh at bitplanet.net> schrieb:

> The plan I have here, and you probably saw that in the TODO, is 
> to just let the client manage the entire 32 bit namespace and
> have a'bind' request:

Good idea. At this point you can also give the global objects
really names (eg. pathnames). A bind request would be something
like an open() ...

A few more such steps and we're at 9P ...

> I suppose we need an unbind to match bind. Client created objects
> will always have a "destroy" request.

Do we really need an explicit destroy ? Why not just an close() ?
(gc/refcount will take care of the rest).


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt at metux.de
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------