Finishing the network protocol

Enrico Weigelt weigelt at
Thu Apr 21 12:49:45 PDT 2011

* Kristian Høgsberg <krh at> schrieb:

> The plan I have here, and you probably saw that in the TODO, is 
> to just let the client manage the entire 32 bit namespace and
> have a'bind' request:

Good idea. At this point you can also give the global objects
really names (eg. pathnames). A bind request would be something
like an open() ...

A few more such steps and we're at 9P ...

> I suppose we need an unbind to match bind. Client created objects
> will always have a "destroy" request.

Do we really need an explicit destroy ? Why not just an close() ?
(gc/refcount will take care of the rest).

 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service --

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt at
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme

More information about the wayland-devel mailing list