Wayland Window Management Proposal
mostawesomedude at gmail.com
Fri May 13 10:45:05 PDT 2011
I was trying to stay out of this, but...
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach at centrum.cz> wrote:
> This is *not* *about* *optimization*. If you rely on *every* *single*
> *client* to be responsive for your WM to work then the moment *any*
> *single* *client* becomes unresponsive your WM *breaks*.
> If you think a non-broken WM is an optimization I guess we live in
> somewhat different worlds.
Strawman; it is always possible to multiplex I/O in a way that
prevents any single client from blocking things being done in other
clients or internal server work.
P.S. I want an amethyst bikeshed. Not purple, mind you; I want the
bikeshed carved out of a giant amethyst geode. It'll be awesome, I
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir? ~ Keynes
<MostAwesomeDude at gmail.com>
More information about the wayland-devel