[RFC] [tests] Running the wayland tests against compositor-headless

Eoff, Ullysses A ullysses.a.eoff at intel.com
Mon Apr 22 15:48:33 PDT 2013


> -----Original Message-----
> From: wayland-devel-bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:wayland-devel-
> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Eoff,
> Ullysses A
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: Sam Spilsbury; wayland
> Subject: RE: [RFC] [tests] Running the wayland tests against compositor-headless
> 
> Changing the tests to run headless is probably not necessary...
>

To clarify... I only meant this in the context of the weston-tests-env script , i.e.
it does not need to be changed in order for you to automate 'make check' to
run them on headless ;)

...but if it's a problem that the tests themselves can't run on the headless backend,
then changing those in a way to work on headless, too, might be useful.
 
> You can create your own custom "check" script if weston-test-env
> does not suite your needs.  To use it with "make check", just set/export the
> LOG_COMPILER environment variable to refer to that script before running
> "make check".  "make check" just invokes your LOG_COMPILER script with the
> current test as an argument and then uses your scripts exitcode to determine
> pass/fail status.
> 
> See <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Parallel-
> Test-Harness.html>
> 
> I use a custom python script in this manner so that I can run the tests on both
> Weston drm and x11 backends per test with only one invocation of "make
> check".
> My custom script also allows me to parse the test output/results into a standard,
> normalized
> Xml format that is recognized by our continuous integration server.
> 
> U. Artie Eoff
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wayland-devel-
> bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org
> > [mailto:wayland-devel-
> > bounces+ullysses.a.eoff=intel.com at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Sam
> > Spilsbury
> > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:50 AM
> > To: wayland
> > Subject: [RFC] [tests] Running the wayland tests against compositor-headless
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is a work-item that's already in-progress by
> > somebody. I noticed that weston has a "headless" compositor backend
> > and a "no-op" renderer, which effectively do not depend on having
> > OpenGL or *a* windowing system available at the time that weston is
> > run.
> >
> > It would be really great if we could run the tests against this
> > backend, because then it means that they can be run on foreign
> > machines like continuous integration servers with ease.
> >
> > I've tried quickly changing the backend over in weston-test-env -
> > currently most of the tests are failing because client->pointer is not
> > initialized. Upon initializing that, most of them pass except those
> > that depend on client->keyboard . I suspect that this will involve
> > having to create a wl_keyboard with a set of dummy xkb data for
> > layouts, though I'm not sure how to do that yet.
> >
> > My question to the list is - does it make sense to submit a patch to
> > change the tests over to use the headless backend? Or is the
> > preference to keep them using the wayland or x11 backend for now.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Sam.
> >
> > --
> > Sam Spilsbury
> > _______________________________________________
> > wayland-devel mailing list
> > wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list