[PATCH v4] pixman: Destroy pixman images when underlying buffer is destroyed

Lubomir Rintel lkundrak at v3.sk
Thu Dec 12 03:55:24 PST 2013


On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:54 -0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:31:37AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > While the pixman image might be attached, the underlying buffer might be
> > already gone under certain circumstances. This is easily reproduced by
> > attempting to resize gnome-terminal on a fbdev backend.
> > 
> > $ WAYLAND_DEBUG=1 strace -emunmap weston --backend=fbdev-backend.so
> > ...
> > [1524826.942] wl_shm at 7.create_pool(new id wl_shm_pool at 23, fd 40, 1563540)
> > [1524827.315] wl_shm_pool at 23.create_buffer(new id wl_buffer at 24, 0, 759, 515, 3036, 0)
> > ...
> > [1524829.488] wl_surface at 14.attach(wl_buffer at 24, 0, 0)
> > [1524829.766] wl_surface at 14.set_buffer_scale(1)
> > [1524829.904] wl_surface at 14.damage(0, 0, 759, 515)
> > [1524830.248] wl_surface at 14.frame(new id wl_callback at 25)
> > [1524830.450] wl_surface at 14.commit()
> > ...
> > [1524846.706] wl_shm at 7.create_pool(new id wl_shm_pool at 26, fd 40, 1545000)
> > [1524847.215] wl_shm_pool at 26.create_buffer(new id wl_buffer at 27, 0, 750, 515, 3000, 0)
> > [1524847.735] wl_buffer at 24.destroy()
> > [1524847.953]  -> wl_display at 1.delete_id(24)
> > [1524848.144] wl_shm_pool at 23.destroy()
> > munmap(0xb5b2e000, 1563540)             = 0
> > [1524849.021]  -> wl_display at 1.delete_id(23)
> > [1524849.425] wl_surface at 14.attach(wl_buffer at 27, 0, 0)
> > [1524849.730] wl_surface at 14.set_buffer_scale(1)
> > [1524849.821] wl_surface at 14.damage(0, 0, 750, 515)
> > <No commit yet, so drawing is attempted from older buffer that used to be
> >  attached to the surface, which happens to come from a destroyed pool,
> >  resulting it an invalid read from address 0xb5b2e000>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>
> > ---
> > Thank you for your responses, Kristian & Pekka.
> > Hopefully it's correct now.
> 
> Hi Lubomir,
> 
> Sorry, but I think we have to do one more round...
> 
> > Changes to v2:
> >   - Added listener instead of checking the buffer mapping,
> >     as suggested by Pekka Paalanen
> >   - Added more context to the commit message
> > Changes to v3:
> >   - Removed unnecessary buffer unreferences and signal handler unhook
> >     of itself after it was called, suggested by Pekka Paalanen
> >   - Unhook the signal if we destroy the surface or reattach the buffer
> >     to avoid circular attachment or call after the surface state is gone
> > Changes to v4:
> >   - Unhook the listener early when replacing surface's buffer
> > 
> >  src/pixman-renderer.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/pixman-renderer.c b/src/pixman-renderer.c
> > index e854e2a..83a69de 100644
> > --- a/src/pixman-renderer.c
> > +++ b/src/pixman-renderer.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct pixman_surface_state {
> >  	pixman_image_t *image;
> >  	struct weston_buffer_reference buffer_ref;
> >  
> > +	struct wl_listener buffer_destroy_listener;
> >  	struct wl_listener surface_destroy_listener;
> >  	struct wl_listener renderer_destroy_listener;
> >  };
> > @@ -450,6 +451,22 @@ pixman_renderer_flush_damage(struct weston_surface *surface)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > +buffer_state_handle_buffer_destroy(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct pixman_surface_state *ps;
> > +
> > +	ps = container_of(listener, struct pixman_surface_state,
> > +			  buffer_destroy_listener);
> > +
> > +	if (ps->image) {
> > +		pixman_image_unref(ps->image);
> > +		ps->image = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ps->buffer_destroy_listener.notify = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> >  pixman_renderer_attach(struct weston_surface *es, struct weston_buffer *buffer)
> >  {
> >  	struct pixman_surface_state *ps = get_surface_state(es);
> > @@ -458,6 +475,9 @@ pixman_renderer_attach(struct weston_surface *es, struct weston_buffer *buffer)
> >  
> >  	weston_buffer_reference(&ps->buffer_ref, buffer);
> >  
> > +	if (ps->buffer_destroy_listener.notify)
> > +		wl_list_remove(&ps->buffer_destroy_listener.link);
> 
> If you want to use ps->buffer_destroy_listener.notify == NULL to
> indicate that there is no listener, you have to set that here.  As it
> is, pixman_renderer_surface_state_destroy() or another attach with
> NULL will remove the listener again, causing list corruption.
> 
> Better would be to instead use ps->image == NULL for this.  That is,
> ps->buffer_destroy_listener is installed if and only if ps->image is
> non-NULL.

That is not actually true. It is possible for weston_surface to have
ps->image set, but no wl_buffer attached and thus no listener hooked --
weston uses that internally when doing fades.

Therefore I'll follow up with an updated patch implementing the first
option.

> Kristian
> 
> >  	if (ps->image) {
> >  		pixman_image_unref(ps->image);
> >  		ps->image = NULL;
> > @@ -499,6 +519,11 @@ pixman_renderer_attach(struct weston_surface *es, struct weston_buffer *buffer)
> >  		buffer->width, buffer->height,
> >  		wl_shm_buffer_get_data(shm_buffer),
> >  		wl_shm_buffer_get_stride(shm_buffer));
> > +
> > +	ps->buffer_destroy_listener.notify =
> > +		buffer_state_handle_buffer_destroy;
> > +	wl_signal_add(&buffer->destroy_signal,
> > +		      &ps->buffer_destroy_listener);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void
> > @@ -506,7 +531,8 @@ pixman_renderer_surface_state_destroy(struct pixman_surface_state *ps)
> >  {
> >  	wl_list_remove(&ps->surface_destroy_listener.link);
> >  	wl_list_remove(&ps->renderer_destroy_listener.link);
> > -
> > +	if (ps->buffer_destroy_listener.notify)
> > +		wl_list_remove(&ps->buffer_destroy_listener.link);
> >  
> >  	ps->surface->renderer_state = NULL;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.8.4.2
> > 




More information about the wayland-devel mailing list