Questions and thoughts about input method protocol

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:45:25 -0500
Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Pekka Vuorela <pvuorela at iki.fi> wrote:
> > Problem with window titles and all is that they are information not meant to
> > input method. Those are meant for the user and can change any time and to
> > anything. And using those will require application specific logic in the
> > input method, like specific rules for specific application.
> > Don't see that feasible except for very special cases.
> 
> They will never change to random things and the only necessary thing
> to do is keyword matching. And it will able to work for most cases
> unless you have a window title like "window 1".

Hi Yu,

I have a trivial example of an application that will always have a
random window title: a terminal.

The window titles of my terminals in X show the current working
directory and some other environment variables. There is no way you can
use the window title to infer anything useful, especially when it is a
matter of user's shell and prompt preferences. It does not say
"terminal" or "bash" anywhere. There is no keyword you could match.
Also, other apps that run in the terminal, may or may not set the window
title to their own random things.

Web browsers are actually the same. There is nothing requiring the
browser name or website URL to be in the window title. You simply
cannot trust it. In fact, in many cases on desktop, there can be an
icon next to the title, and in that case it is just waste of space to
have the application name in the window title.

As you are now creating a new common protocol, you have a chance to
design things to be reliable from the start. If you need more
information from clients, add explicit protocol for it, and specify
exactly what you want, and how it can be used.


Thanks,
pq