[PATCH]: mtdev could be disabled at configuration
Marc Chalain
marc.chalain at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 00:47:32 PDT 2013
Hi Pekka,
I agree with --disable-multitouch.
For the comparison between the use of ifdef and no-op functions. I think
the second solution is ambiguous, we disable the feature in one side and we
use the API in the other side.
I look if it's possible to have a third solution which satisfies every
body...
Marc.
2013/6/10 Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:11:14 +0200
> Marc Chalain <marc.chalain at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > mtdev is not necessary on some device (desktop or set-top-box). For
> > embedded solution the minimum of dependencies is required. "configure"
> > accepts the --disable-mtdev option.
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> with this patch, if weston is compiled with --disable-mtdev, it looks
> like it will still happily open multitouch devices, expose them to
> Wayland clients, and feed them garbage or fail or whatever. Right?
>
> I think the proper approach is to change the configure option into
> --disable-multitouch or --disable-touchscreen, which would not only
> drop the dependency to mtdev, but also make Weston ignore all
> touchscreen devices since it will not be able to handle them.
>
> As the cherry on top, when a touchscreen device gets ignored during
> input device detection, it would be nice to print a log message saying
> it was ignored because touchscreen support was not built, instead of
> the usual log message.
>
> Also, there are not that many mtdev functions, so to minimize the
> number of #ifdefs is the code, you could define no-op functions for a
> few mtdev entry points when the real mtdev is not used.
>
>
> Thanks,
> pq
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20130610/02a45c3a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list