Make safe double remove?
Neil Roberts
neil at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 29 03:46:59 PST 2014
Jonathan Howard <jonathan at unbiased.name> writes:
> wl_list_remove changed isn't 100% guaranteed to not break anything, on
> the other hand there is no guarantee the code does not have the fatal
> double remove already.
We definitely do already have a double-remove bug in Weston as described
here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-January/012891.html
I think the proposed change to wl_list_remove would fix that too.
Regards,
- Neil
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20140129/5be7f1c1/attachment.pgp>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list