[PATCH] protocol: remove redundant 'the' in description

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Fri, 23 May 2014 03:04:29 -0400
"Jasper St. Pierre" <jstpierre at mecheye.net> wrote:

> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 23 May 2014 07:26:56 +0200
> > Silvan Jegen <s.jegen at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Silvan Jegen <s.jegen at gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  protocol/wayland.xml | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml b/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > index 22eb6e7..113c7b7 100644
> > > --- a/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > +++ b/protocol/wayland.xml
> > > @@ -550,8 +550,8 @@
> > >       The current and pending input regions of the icon wl_surface are
> > >       cleared, and wl_surface.set_input_region is ignored until the
> > >       wl_surface is no longer used as the icon surface. When the use
> > > -     as an icon ends, the the current and pending input regions
> > > -     become undefined, and the wl_surface is unmapped.
> > > +     as an icon ends, the current and pending input regions become
> > > +     undefined, and the wl_surface is unmapped.
> > >        </description>
> > >        <arg name="source" type="object" interface="wl_data_source"
> > allow-null="true"/>
> > >        <arg name="origin" type="object" interface="wl_surface"/>
> >
> > This is obviously correct.
> >
> > Can I push this, or shall we reserve the right to push to libwayland
> > for Kristian only, even for "obviously trivial" patches?
> >
> 
> If you received permissions to push, I don't see why you shouldn't.
> Kristian trusts you enough to add you to the list of committers, so I think
> he can trust your judgement on stuff like this.

The talk was only about Weston AFAIU. I don't know if libwayland is
actually open for the group 'wayland' to push. Even if it was open
by access permissions on the server, I still want to be sure that I am
allowed (in the social sense) to push.

Like I have access to the Mesa repo from years ago, but I'm still not
allowed to push without proper review process which is defined by the
Mesa project.

The process for libwayland is still unclear to me, hence my question.

- pq