EFL/Wayland and xdg-shell
Jan Arne Petersen
janarne at gmail.com
Tue Apr 14 05:13:00 PDT 2015
On 14.04.2015 05:19, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>>> The solution GNOME takes, which is admittedly maybe too unrealistic,
>>> is that IBus is our input method framework, and thus our compositor
>>> has somewhat tight integration with IBus. I don't think input methods
>>> need to be part of the core Wayland protocol.
Using exclusively IBus in GNOME compositor is ok. But I do not think
IBus could replace a Wayland text protocol. For example the GNOME screen
keyboard (caribou) does not use IBus but some GTK+ module hack (so it is
broken with most non GNOME applications even when they use IBus).
>> That may be in line with the current thinking in the EFL camp.
>> Does that mean the input-method and text protocol files in weston are of
>> no use at all to gnome?
> These are currently unused by GNOME. They were written by Openismus,
> the company that wrote Maliit, that has shut down now. In my opinion,
> it's too complicated, mandates a split where the keyboard needs to be
That is not true GNOME shell can support the Wayland text protocol and
still use IBus and a gnome-shell keyboard exclusively without the need
to make anything replaceable.
> I'm not sure the text-protocol has any value at all, but I'll let Rui
> Matos, our input method "expert", answer.
There are currently some issues with the text protocol (which we noticed
in real world embedded projects), I will propose a fixed text protocol
soon which will fix this issues and should make it fit to become a core
Note this is all about the text protocol which should be used between
applications and compositor I do not really care about a protocol
between compositor and virtual keyboard (input-method protocol in weston).
Jan Arne Petersen | jan.petersen at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
KDAB - The Qt Experts
More information about the wayland-devel